Sex on the First Date
This article not only gets the science wrong, but also illustrates the problems of applying the intellect to behavior that takes place on the hormonal level.
According to the article,
According to new book The Rough Guide to the Brain, sleeping with someone early on can INCREASE your chances of a long-term relationship.Author and biologist Dr Barry Gibb reckons romps spark chemical changes in the brain that lead to love.
According to writer Bella Battle of the Sun Online, Gibb says that because orgasm releases oxytocin and vasopressin, which are associated with "the build-up of commitment," well, the sooner you start building that up, the better. Now, Battle may be misquoting Gibb. In any case, there's a big science mistake here.
It's true that oxytocin seems to be the hormone that, along with dopamine, causes that deep bond we know as love. But its effect on the two sexes is highly unequal. Estrogen increases oxytocin's effects, while testosterone decreases them. Therefore, after a single night of sex, it's likely that the woman will feel much more bonded than the man. Oxytocin's effects in the male bloodstream fall within minutes; it may take days for them to decrease in a female's.
Moreover, vasopressin seems to be related to bonding in men, sorta. It's likely involved more in the human versions of mate-guarding and nest-defending. That is, once the man feels bonded to his mate, vasopressin will incite him to take care of her. But this response probably happens over time.
Now to part two. Next, Battle asked two experts whether it was a good idea to have sex on the first date.
Sara Hedly, a sexpert, says it's not, because there's still a stigma for a woman to do this. Petra Boynton, a sex researcher, says you should go for it if it feels right.
The first response, based on societal norms, won't be enough of a reason to stop a lot of people. The second response assumes there's no emotional risk.
I wish people would make an informed decision based on whether or not they want to risk feeling bonded to this person.

The notion we should have sex early on just to build a bond might be absurd for at least three reasons:
First, it would seem to short-circuit the courtship process in which we hopefully discover enough about the other person to recognize whether we actually want to bond with them.
Second, it would seem to value committment above compatibility, mutual respect, shared expectations, and several other things that are more important to many of us than committment alone.
Last, it seems based on the notion that love and committment will overcome all difficulties. But I don't think that's true. So far as I know, people can and do love people they are incompatible with in ways that would make a marriage between them sheer folly.
I quite agree with you, Susan, that Gibb, if he's being correctly quoted, offers very bad advice.
Posted by: Paul Sunstone | May 04, 2007 at 08:43 PM
You bring up a very good point that I hadn't thought of, Paul: the idea of valuing commitment more than compatibility. The idea that love and commitment conquers all is very entrenched in our culture; it's what's led to our high divorce rate, IMHO.
Posted by: Susan Kuchinskas | May 05, 2007 at 09:11 AM